<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hide Your Lunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/</link>
	<description>Sacramento News, Gossip &#38; Snark</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  3 Dec 2008 06:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: FrankHaxor</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-22695</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankHaxor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-22695</guid>
		<description>Repeatedly I see debates that eventually lower themselves to attack Moore on a personal level, in so far as we (the public) can, considering most of us don't know him personally. 

The point is you're missing the point if you are caught up in the drivel. 

I agree that Moore uses some extremist rhetoric that while likely being fact based somewhere along the line, like and statistic it's bent to the purpose of those reiterating them. He inflates the issues a bit, or makes light of them in a fairly smarmy manner. These are all things that can be agreed on as far as I can tell. 

So how is it we're not getting the point? 

Moore is doing one thing right. It's not the presentation, it's not whether he's right or wrong, it's not that he doesn't live a healthy lifestyle himself - it *is* that a topic that a lot of people weren't mulling over in any serious capacity is now getting nationwide scrutiny. That is the important part. People need to think about things that effect them before they're inundated with reacting to them after it's too late. 

You, and I, and your fellow citizens are exchanging views about our healthcare system in a much more enthusiastic manner than usual. He just provided the catalyst. It's up to all of us do decide what to do with our conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repeatedly I see debates that eventually lower themselves to attack Moore on a personal level, in so far as we (the public) can, considering most of us don&#8217;t know him personally. </p>
<p>The point is you&#8217;re missing the point if you are caught up in the drivel. </p>
<p>I agree that Moore uses some extremist rhetoric that while likely being fact based somewhere along the line, like and statistic it&#8217;s bent to the purpose of those reiterating them. He inflates the issues a bit, or makes light of them in a fairly smarmy manner. These are all things that can be agreed on as far as I can tell. </p>
<p>So how is it we&#8217;re not getting the point? </p>
<p>Moore is doing one thing right. It&#8217;s not the presentation, it&#8217;s not whether he&#8217;s right or wrong, it&#8217;s not that he doesn&#8217;t live a healthy lifestyle himself - it *is* that a topic that a lot of people weren&#8217;t mulling over in any serious capacity is now getting nationwide scrutiny. That is the important part. People need to think about things that effect them before they&#8217;re inundated with reacting to them after it&#8217;s too late. </p>
<p>You, and I, and your fellow citizens are exchanging views about our healthcare system in a much more enthusiastic manner than usual. He just provided the catalyst. It&#8217;s up to all of us do decide what to do with our conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris brown</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16551</link>
		<dc:creator>chris brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16551</guid>
		<description>yo, just wanted to bump the comments over the 50 mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo, just wanted to bump the comments over the 50 mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SinghCity</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16550</link>
		<dc:creator>SinghCity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16550</guid>
		<description>I wouldn't disparage freaking nuts in such a manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t disparage freaking nuts in such a manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyMeg</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16548</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyMeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16548</guid>
		<description>I'll see you an "Amen" and raise you a "Hell Yeah."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll see you an &#8220;Amen&#8221; and raise you a &#8220;Hell Yeah.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolDMZ</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16547</link>
		<dc:creator>CoolDMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16547</guid>
		<description>just when you think we can't all agree on something, there it is: that Turty Squip guy is freakin nuts. can i get an amen, SinghCity and HeyMeg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just when you think we can&#8217;t all agree on something, there it is: that Turty Squip guy is freakin nuts. can i get an amen, SinghCity and HeyMeg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sac-eats</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16546</link>
		<dc:creator>sac-eats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16546</guid>
		<description>I have only one thing to add to the whole argument:  That C. Everett Koop guy was no slender model of fitness himself, so there.  That's it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only one thing to add to the whole argument:  That C. Everett Koop guy was no slender model of fitness himself, so there.  That&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turty Squip</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16543</link>
		<dc:creator>Turty Squip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16543</guid>
		<description>Go to medical school yourself so you can treat fat poor people for free, or at your own loss.
    Health care ain't broken: The drugs and machines for diagnosis/repair are second to none in the US.  Like high end cars in Italy.  You don't see Italians bitching about not being able to drive a Tetrazzini Fasterossa because the car companys charge too much.  You want a fast car- save up.  You want a new liver to replace the one you drank under the table- save up.  Or get a job/pension that provides benefits along them lines.  
    It's all life choices kids.  If you are an 89 year old who can afford a new lung, good for you- the 89 year old who worked at Starbucks all his life, and partied and took vacations and bought new (crappy) cars doesn't get the same lung.  Too bad.  Who the heck said special health care was a consititutional right?
    If you REALLY want to make health care more "affordable", eliminate the extraordinary measures we take to save: 1) the very elderly (diminishing returns), 2) "undocumented" peoples (they didn't pay (however minimally) into the system in the first place) and 3) people with behaviorally induced "conditions": fattness (diabetes, CHD), AIDS and other STDs, lung and skin cancers, etc.  NOW you are saving some real money.  Oh- and supply only band aids and asprin to prisoners.  You just saved a billion bux there alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to medical school yourself so you can treat fat poor people for free, or at your own loss.<br />
    Health care ain&#8217;t broken: The drugs and machines for diagnosis/repair are second to none in the US.  Like high end cars in Italy.  You don&#8217;t see Italians bitching about not being able to drive a Tetrazzini Fasterossa because the car companys charge too much.  You want a fast car- save up.  You want a new liver to replace the one you drank under the table- save up.  Or get a job/pension that provides benefits along them lines.<br />
    It&#8217;s all life choices kids.  If you are an 89 year old who can afford a new lung, good for you- the 89 year old who worked at Starbucks all his life, and partied and took vacations and bought new (crappy) cars doesn&#8217;t get the same lung.  Too bad.  Who the heck said special health care was a consititutional right?<br />
    If you REALLY want to make health care more &#8220;affordable&#8221;, eliminate the extraordinary measures we take to save: 1) the very elderly (diminishing returns), 2) &#8220;undocumented&#8221; peoples (they didn&#8217;t pay (however minimally) into the system in the first place) and 3) people with behaviorally induced &#8220;conditions&#8221;: fattness (diabetes, CHD), AIDS and other STDs, lung and skin cancers, etc.  NOW you are saving some real money.  Oh- and supply only band aids and asprin to prisoners.  You just saved a billion bux there alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16331</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16331</guid>
		<description>but if the problem is bureaucratic overspending, any sort of government-provided system would be far worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but if the problem is bureaucratic overspending, any sort of government-provided system would be far worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeinsac</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16330</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeinsac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16330</guid>
		<description>Not being a big fan of MM, I can still see the validity of his testimony.  After all, many other "experts" have their own agenda and the last thing we need is health insurance executives lecturing on how to address the issues.

Anyone who thinks we don't have a problem with health insurance has never attempted to obtain a policy with even a minor health risk (high blood pressure, prior cancer, older, etc.).  The present system of employer based health insurance is failing even those persons who want to obtain insurance not just those who can't afford it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not being a big fan of MM, I can still see the validity of his testimony.  After all, many other &#8220;experts&#8221; have their own agenda and the last thing we need is health insurance executives lecturing on how to address the issues.</p>
<p>Anyone who thinks we don&#8217;t have a problem with health insurance has never attempted to obtain a policy with even a minor health risk (high blood pressure, prior cancer, older, etc.).  The present system of employer based health insurance is failing even those persons who want to obtain insurance not just those who can&#8217;t afford it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynnn</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16308</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynnn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16308</guid>
		<description>Moore might live in a mansion... but he still cares about common people... he has to care to spend three years making a movie about health care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore might live in a mansion&#8230; but he still cares about common people&#8230; he has to care to spend three years making a movie about health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cooldmz</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16305</link>
		<dc:creator>cooldmz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 03:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16305</guid>
		<description>I want to reiterate that the argument I advanced, that Michael Moore's poor stewardship of his own health undermines his arguments that the American health care system is broken, was a pointless argument that I advanced mostly because I had free time. I am far more concerned that the CA legislature is full of hypocrites and downright snakes. You really do have to see the little clip of Fabian Nunez saying we're finally going to work on health care reform.
http://www.kcra.com/newsarchive/13491726/detail.html

Lulu: I would be far more likely to run for vice president on a platform of more beef or "Kill McDreamy" than on a fatophobia campaign. I am about 30 pounds overweight myself. 

I want HeyMeg's comment to fight Hitchens' article...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to reiterate that the argument I advanced, that Michael Moore&#8217;s poor stewardship of his own health undermines his arguments that the American health care system is broken, was a pointless argument that I advanced mostly because I had free time. I am far more concerned that the CA legislature is full of hypocrites and downright snakes. You really do have to see the little clip of Fabian Nunez saying we&#8217;re finally going to work on health care reform.<br />
<a href="http://www.kcra.com/newsarchive/13491726/detail.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kcra.com/newsarchive/13491726/detail.html</a></p>
<p>Lulu: I would be far more likely to run for vice president on a platform of more beef or &#8220;Kill McDreamy&#8221; than on a fatophobia campaign. I am about 30 pounds overweight myself. </p>
<p>I want HeyMeg&#8217;s comment to fight Hitchens&#8217; article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lulu</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16304</link>
		<dc:creator>Lulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 03:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16304</guid>
		<description>They better get a better platform than fatphobia. 

But I guess some people think cheap jokes about people's appearance are funny.

I just think it's lazy. And, oh yeah, bigoted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They better get a better platform than fatphobia. </p>
<p>But I guess some people think cheap jokes about people&#8217;s appearance are funny.</p>
<p>I just think it&#8217;s lazy. And, oh yeah, bigoted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RunnerGirl</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16287</link>
		<dc:creator>RunnerGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16287</guid>
		<description>HeyMeg/DMZ '08!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HeyMeg/DMZ &#8216;08!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amrit</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16286</link>
		<dc:creator>amrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16286</guid>
		<description>Don't you people have jobs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you people have jobs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyMeg</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16285</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyMeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16285</guid>
		<description>It's not that I "hate" Michael Moore. It's that I think he's an extremist windbag and kind of a buffoon and therefore I feel entitled to make fun of him on the internet. You can't seriously have a problem with that. You're not seriously telling me that if Rush Limbaugh or the dude that drives around downtown shouting anti-gay slogans from his pick-up truck was advising the legislature that you wouldn't at a minimum make jokes. 

This has nothing to do with my opinions about public health care. This has to do with my opinions on legislative process. I think it's ridiculous for the legislature to consult a film director on a policy issue as difficult and complex as public health care.  To me it shows a problem with the process.  

SinghCity as for those credibility problems, 10 minutes on Google can answer your questions.  I'm not going to index the list of factual errors and intentional misrepresentations present in MM's past films here because that's frankly kind of boring and it’s been done in about a dozen other places.  I don't think MM's past mistakes condemn him as a filmmaker. But the natural response to previous misinformation is to question present veracity.  And I don't think MM's hypocricy condemns him as a person, but it does diminish his integrity as an advocate. At any rate, the point I'm making above is simply that the legislature should get over being star-struck and stop interviewing unqualified celebrities when making important policy decisions.  

Just to further clarify, I don’t think MM’s worst act of hypocrisy is being overweight while pontificating about health care.  I really was just making jokes because it's fun to make jokes sometimes. Don't pretend you're above that. MM's hypocrisy is more evident in the fact that his life's work is to preach about the selfishness and materialism of the evil rich American capitalist elite while raking in millions of dollars for his movies, tens of thousands for his speaking engagements, jet-setting around to film festivals, riding in limousines, staying in luxury hotels, residing in multi-million dollar homes, sending his daughter to an exclusive private school on the Upper West Side and otherwise sheltering himself from his supposedly beloved working class. I don’t suppose for a minute that he would set foot in just any old public hospital for treatment in this or any other Country.  I do suppose that he would use his plentiful resources to take advantage of a competitive capitalist market and choose the best possible options for him and his family regardless of what others are getting.  Without commenting on the degree of ethics in that approach, I’m just saying that MM is no different than the American elite he so powerfully despises. 

HeyMeg out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that I &#8220;hate&#8221; Michael Moore. It&#8217;s that I think he&#8217;s an extremist windbag and kind of a buffoon and therefore I feel entitled to make fun of him on the internet. You can&#8217;t seriously have a problem with that. You&#8217;re not seriously telling me that if Rush Limbaugh or the dude that drives around downtown shouting anti-gay slogans from his pick-up truck was advising the legislature that you wouldn&#8217;t at a minimum make jokes. </p>
<p>This has nothing to do with my opinions about public health care. This has to do with my opinions on legislative process. I think it&#8217;s ridiculous for the legislature to consult a film director on a policy issue as difficult and complex as public health care.  To me it shows a problem with the process.  </p>
<p>SinghCity as for those credibility problems, 10 minutes on Google can answer your questions.  I&#8217;m not going to index the list of factual errors and intentional misrepresentations present in MM&#8217;s past films here because that&#8217;s frankly kind of boring and it’s been done in about a dozen other places.  I don&#8217;t think MM&#8217;s past mistakes condemn him as a filmmaker. But the natural response to previous misinformation is to question present veracity.  And I don&#8217;t think MM&#8217;s hypocricy condemns him as a person, but it does diminish his integrity as an advocate. At any rate, the point I&#8217;m making above is simply that the legislature should get over being star-struck and stop interviewing unqualified celebrities when making important policy decisions.  </p>
<p>Just to further clarify, I don’t think MM’s worst act of hypocrisy is being overweight while pontificating about health care.  I really was just making jokes because it&#8217;s fun to make jokes sometimes. Don&#8217;t pretend you&#8217;re above that. MM&#8217;s hypocrisy is more evident in the fact that his life&#8217;s work is to preach about the selfishness and materialism of the evil rich American capitalist elite while raking in millions of dollars for his movies, tens of thousands for his speaking engagements, jet-setting around to film festivals, riding in limousines, staying in luxury hotels, residing in multi-million dollar homes, sending his daughter to an exclusive private school on the Upper West Side and otherwise sheltering himself from his supposedly beloved working class. I don’t suppose for a minute that he would set foot in just any old public hospital for treatment in this or any other Country.  I do suppose that he would use his plentiful resources to take advantage of a competitive capitalist market and choose the best possible options for him and his family regardless of what others are getting.  Without commenting on the degree of ethics in that approach, I’m just saying that MM is no different than the American elite he so powerfully despises. </p>
<p>HeyMeg out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolDMZ</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16283</link>
		<dc:creator>CoolDMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16283</guid>
		<description>"bias" is an overrated concept. however i am shocked, shocked that you have a negative opinion on Hitchen's piece. 

the obesity of tens of millions of people is a strain on the system. i still haven't seen "Sicko" because it is still not set to release for another 2 weeks, so i can only attack his track record. maybe this is the film where he turns that around, like you're saying. Malcolm Gladwell, wouldn't you agree that it's important for me to trust my instinct? 

truth be told, i'm way more likely to see this movie and be moved by it than you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;bias&#8221; is an overrated concept. however i am shocked, shocked that you have a negative opinion on Hitchen&#8217;s piece. </p>
<p>the obesity of tens of millions of people is a strain on the system. i still haven&#8217;t seen &#8220;Sicko&#8221; because it is still not set to release for another 2 weeks, so i can only attack his track record. maybe this is the film where he turns that around, like you&#8217;re saying. Malcolm Gladwell, wouldn&#8217;t you agree that it&#8217;s important for me to trust my instinct? </p>
<p>truth be told, i&#8217;m way more likely to see this movie and be moved by it than you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SinghCity</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16281</link>
		<dc:creator>SinghCity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16281</guid>
		<description>Thanks for admitting your own bias in this argument.

It's commonly acknowledged that the US health care system bleeds from bureaucracy and overspending. This country spends more per capita on health care and gets less for what is spent on a national basis, compared to other countries.  Where is all that money going? Oh, wait...

And, obesity is a problem, yes.  But, Michael Moore's obesity isn't why tens of millions of people in this country aren't getting the health care they need.  His health is also not the reason why people who are on Medicare or other such program, as "Mom" says above, can't get care even when covered.

Hitchens piece is about "F9/11" and is full of hypotheticals and assumptions.  We're talking about Moore's film "Sicko" here...or, at least that's what I thought we were talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for admitting your own bias in this argument.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s commonly acknowledged that the US health care system bleeds from bureaucracy and overspending. This country spends more per capita on health care and gets less for what is spent on a national basis, compared to other countries.  Where is all that money going? Oh, wait&#8230;</p>
<p>And, obesity is a problem, yes.  But, Michael Moore&#8217;s obesity isn&#8217;t why tens of millions of people in this country aren&#8217;t getting the health care they need.  His health is also not the reason why people who are on Medicare or other such program, as &#8220;Mom&#8221; says above, can&#8217;t get care even when covered.</p>
<p>Hitchens piece is about &#8220;F9/11&#8243; and is full of hypotheticals and assumptions.  We&#8217;re talking about Moore&#8217;s film &#8220;Sicko&#8221; here&#8230;or, at least that&#8217;s what I thought we were talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolDMZ</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16280</link>
		<dc:creator>CoolDMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16280</guid>
		<description>A for-profit system that bleeds millions every year to help people who have neglected their own health. I think it's a legit argument to say that this compromises his arguments that something else is wrong with the system. It's also a really unimportant argument, definitely just a nit to pick. Maybe he attempts to prove that the oft-cited thing about obesity driving up healthcare costs is wrong. 

I do dislike Michael Moore, but I think Michael Moore himself does plenty to discredit any legitimate points he may come across. That Hitchens post'll make you go hmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A for-profit system that bleeds millions every year to help people who have neglected their own health. I think it&#8217;s a legit argument to say that this compromises his arguments that something else is wrong with the system. It&#8217;s also a really unimportant argument, definitely just a nit to pick. Maybe he attempts to prove that the oft-cited thing about obesity driving up healthcare costs is wrong. </p>
<p>I do dislike Michael Moore, but I think Michael Moore himself does plenty to discredit any legitimate points he may come across. That Hitchens post&#8217;ll make you go hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SinghCity</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16277</link>
		<dc:creator>SinghCity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16277</guid>
		<description>His weight nor his acknowledgement that he doesn't eat right do not compromise what his film might say about how health care in this country is delivered.  His film is not about teaching people to eat right, but how a for-profit system is not providing the best care for this country. 

Again, you guys simply hate Michael Moore, and so you begin leg-humping arguments to try and discredit anything and everything he does, regardless of the legitimate points he makes - as demonstrated by this blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His weight nor his acknowledgement that he doesn&#8217;t eat right do not compromise what his film might say about how health care in this country is delivered.  His film is not about teaching people to eat right, but how a for-profit system is not providing the best care for this country. </p>
<p>Again, you guys simply hate Michael Moore, and so you begin leg-humping arguments to try and discredit anything and everything he does, regardless of the legitimate points he makes - as demonstrated by this blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolDMZ</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16274</link>
		<dc:creator>CoolDMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16274</guid>
		<description>right, he called himself a hypocrite, acknowledging that his poor health in some way compromises what he's trying to do in his film. after all, one way to improve the healthcare system is for obese people to make with the good eating and the exercising.

i don't know what HeyMeg had in mind about "Sicko" but for the most exhaustive chronicle of the factual problems with "Fahrenheit 911" you have to go with Christopher Hitchens, a pro-Iraq war lefty
http://slate.com/id/2102723/

you don't want to get on Hitchens' bad side...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right, he called himself a hypocrite, acknowledging that his poor health in some way compromises what he&#8217;s trying to do in his film. after all, one way to improve the healthcare system is for obese people to make with the good eating and the exercising.</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t know what HeyMeg had in mind about &#8220;Sicko&#8221; but for the most exhaustive chronicle of the factual problems with &#8220;Fahrenheit 911&#8243; you have to go with Christopher Hitchens, a pro-Iraq war lefty<br />
<a href="http://slate.com/id/2102723/" rel="nofollow">http://slate.com/id/2102723/</a></p>
<p>you don&#8217;t want to get on Hitchens&#8217; bad side&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TalkingPocket</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16273</link>
		<dc:creator>TalkingPocket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16273</guid>
		<description>DMZ: he also made the same joke about being a born again veggie eater on bill maher about 2 to 3 weeks ago. that kinda goes with my point.  moore does easy-for-him interviews. in his films he alsolikes to catch people off guard and ask loaded questions...ie.  why do i pay so much for such a lousy product? though his points are valid it's his method i have a problem with. i don't think you can have constructive conversation while calling your opponent names ( a reason i don't like al frankin and the air america crew). moore is right in his overall message: health care is a criminal racket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DMZ: he also made the same joke about being a born again veggie eater on bill maher about 2 to 3 weeks ago. that kinda goes with my point.  moore does easy-for-him interviews. in his films he alsolikes to catch people off guard and ask loaded questions&#8230;ie.  why do i pay so much for such a lousy product? though his points are valid it&#8217;s his method i have a problem with. i don&#8217;t think you can have constructive conversation while calling your opponent names ( a reason i don&#8217;t like al frankin and the air america crew). moore is right in his overall message: health care is a criminal racket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SinghCity</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16271</link>
		<dc:creator>SinghCity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16271</guid>
		<description>DMZ, Moore's admitted as much before regarding his diet and the realization he's had about his health during the production of his film.

HeyMeg, exactly what part of "Sicko" is not factual?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DMZ, Moore&#8217;s admitted as much before regarding his diet and the realization he&#8217;s had about his health during the production of his film.</p>
<p>HeyMeg, exactly what part of &#8220;Sicko&#8221; is not factual?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyMeg</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16269</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyMeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16269</guid>
		<description>He might also considering checking some of those things, what are they called, facts. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He might also considering checking some of those things, what are they called, facts. <img src='http://sacrag.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolDMZ</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16268</link>
		<dc:creator>CoolDMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16268</guid>
		<description>Yeah, is that really Malcolm Gladwell? I totally started to read "Blink" but ironically I had a bad first impression and put it down. Just kidding, what I read was great and I've been meaning to finish it.

When he talked with that Cuomo guy on ABC, Michael Moore admitted that it was "hypocritical" of him to not eat better and try to get healthier and that he is taking steps to eat more of those things, what are they called, vegetables. His joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, is that really Malcolm Gladwell? I totally started to read &#8220;Blink&#8221; but ironically I had a bad first impression and put it down. Just kidding, what I read was great and I&#8217;ve been meaning to finish it.</p>
<p>When he talked with that Cuomo guy on ABC, Michael Moore admitted that it was &#8220;hypocritical&#8221; of him to not eat better and try to get healthier and that he is taking steps to eat more of those things, what are they called, vegetables. His joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Easily Distracted</title>
		<link>http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16262</link>
		<dc:creator>Easily Distracted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacrag.com/2007/06/hide-your-lunch/#comment-16262</guid>
		<description>Wow, is that really Malcolm Gladwell commenting on this here blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, is that really Malcolm Gladwell commenting on this here blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
