Comments on: OMG a new low for CBS13 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/ Sacramento News, Gossip & Snark Wed, 3 Dec 2008 21:44:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Radio Matthew http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30386 Radio Matthew Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:33:52 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30386 Totally, eh? I'm a little upset at Sac Bee for using one of my videos on the 21Q blog and taking it completely out of context when it comes to CBS 13. Totally, eh?

I’m a little upset at Sac Bee for using one of my videos on the 21Q blog and taking it completely out of context when it comes to CBS 13.

]]> By: roger http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30362 roger Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:08:46 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30362 somebody ought to tell TMZ that CBS13 totally already covered it. somebody ought to tell TMZ that CBS13 totally already covered it.

]]> By: Radio Matthew http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30323 Radio Matthew Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:34:06 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30323 Ugh, people won't let this freakin' topic die. The story made TMZ on TV... Ugh, people won’t let this freakin’ topic die. The story made TMZ on TV…

]]> By: TalkingPocket http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30221 TalkingPocket Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:38:01 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30221 anyone want to clear up those typos, feel free. all day family can warp you a little. anyone want to clear up those typos, feel free. all day family can warp you a little.

]]> By: TalkingPocket http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30220 TalkingPocket Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:36:00 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30220 yes, bloggers need credibility...that's the point dipshit. that's what bloggers have been trying to gain by seeking after journalistic protections for sources and what-not. you think the folks at truthdig.org and huffingtonpost.com don't want cred? unless you're happy with a site like the superficial.com. and no, you don't see a url because i'm not a blogger, i don't have a website, i haven't the time nor the inclination. bravo to you for having both. bang! yes, bloggers need credibility…that’s the point dipshit. that’s what bloggers have been trying to gain by seeking after journalistic protections for sources and what-not. you think the folks at truthdig.org and huffingtonpost.com don’t want cred? unless you’re happy with a site like the superficial.com. and no, you don’t see a url because i’m not a blogger, i don’t have a website, i haven’t the time nor the inclination. bravo to you for having both. bang!

]]> By: Radio Matthew http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30187 Radio Matthew Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:45:39 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30187 <i>again matthew, with the blaring cbs13 logo/link on your front page you lose all credibility when speaking on their behalf.</i> Bloggers need credibility? At least I'm not afraid to put my URL in my comments...where's YOUR website, TalkingPocket? And so what if I have their logo on my front page—am I not allowed to display what I want how I want on my website? Do you see me bashing the SacRag for attacking CBS? Nope...I just give my happy opinion and then I'm on my way. Personal attacks are cheap blows. It's like firing blanks when you have no ammunition, just to say you fired something. again matthew, with the blaring cbs13 logo/link on your front page you lose all credibility when speaking on their behalf.

Bloggers need credibility? At least I’m not afraid to put my URL in my comments…where’s YOUR website, TalkingPocket? And so what if I have their logo on my front page—am I not allowed to display what I want how I want on my website? Do you see me bashing the SacRag for attacking CBS? Nope…I just give my happy opinion and then I’m on my way.

Personal attacks are cheap blows. It’s like firing blanks when you have no ammunition, just to say you fired something.

]]> By: Lynn http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30178 Lynn Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:34:00 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30178 Chris Burrous has shown that he has what it takes to take over for Maury Povich or Jerry Springer. Chris Burrous has shown that he has what it takes to take over for Maury Povich or Jerry Springer.

]]> By: TalkingPocket http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30151 TalkingPocket Thu, 22 Nov 2007 06:04:29 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30151 you can always count on matthew to come to the rescue whenever his beloved chris is in trouble. again matthew, with the blaring cbs13 logo/link on your front page you lose all credibility when speaking on their behalf. you can always count on matthew to come to the rescue whenever his beloved chris is in trouble. again matthew, with the blaring cbs13 logo/link on your front page you lose all credibility when speaking on their behalf.

]]> By: Radio Matthew http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30132 Radio Matthew Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:21:08 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30132 <i>And blatant stereotyping if you think “all homeless are alcoholics” who wouldn’t enjoy a beer.</i> Amen to that! The hypocrites are the ones who give money to the homeless, yet bash those who cut out the middleman and deliver the goods themselves. What do you think they're doing with the $5 bill you give them on the street corner? Investing in tech stock? And blatant stereotyping if you think “all homeless are alcoholics” who wouldn’t enjoy a beer.

Amen to that! The hypocrites are the ones who give money to the homeless, yet bash those who cut out the middleman and deliver the goods themselves. What do you think they’re doing with the $5 bill you give them on the street corner? Investing in tech stock?

]]> By: Turty Squip http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30096 Turty Squip Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:40:50 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30096 It's not like he was passing out crack to 8 year olds. Seems a little hypocritical for the "feed the homeless" bunch to critisize donations of any untainted/sealed food products on Thanksgiving. And blatant stereotyping if you think "all homeless are alcoholics" who wouldn't enjoy a beer. Though I'm worried about the issue of a Mayor potential influencing voting with alcoholic beverages. If we could find out Crhis' (sic) political leanings, the other side could call for an investigation and hearings? It’s not like he was passing out crack to 8 year olds. Seems a little hypocritical for the “feed the homeless” bunch to critisize donations of any untainted/sealed food products on Thanksgiving. And blatant stereotyping if you think “all homeless are alcoholics” who wouldn’t enjoy a beer.

Though I’m worried about the issue of a Mayor potential influencing voting with alcoholic beverages. If we could find out Crhis’ (sic) political leanings, the other side could call for an investigation and hearings?

]]> By: Radio Matthew http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30095 Radio Matthew Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:17:18 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30095 Radio is Arbitron #27, so that's definitely not top 25...and television's #20 by Nielsen, so that's just barely making it there. But as for the whole incident, so what? Who cares? Why is this offensive? To me, this isn't any worse than people who give money to panhandlers on the streets...they're going to use the money on the same stuff. This is just like cutting out the middleman. Radio is Arbitron #27, so that’s definitely not top 25…and television’s #20 by Nielsen, so that’s just barely making it there.

But as for the whole incident, so what? Who cares? Why is this offensive? To me, this isn’t any worse than people who give money to panhandlers on the streets…they’re going to use the money on the same stuff. This is just like cutting out the middleman.

]]> By: sac-eats http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30092 sac-eats Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:00:53 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30092 We're a top 25 media market. You think he could have afforded more than Bud Light. C'mon Chris, pony up for some Sam Adams Octoberfest. We’re a top 25 media market. You think he could have afforded more than Bud Light. C’mon Chris, pony up for some Sam Adams Octoberfest.

]]> By: Radio Matthew http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30085 Radio Matthew Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:34:09 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30085 Who was offended by that? I wasn't offended by it...I don't see what's wrong. Who was offended by that? I wasn’t offended by it…I don’t see what’s wrong.

]]> By: TalkingPocket http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30056 TalkingPocket Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:41:24 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30056 well, you can see for yourself (some nice person posted it on youtube here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdHiBlXYLJU) his colleagues and officer Wetzel were taken aback by his stunt and that has to speak to something. though, i think it was on par for his anything-for-ratings style. well, you can see for yourself (some nice person posted it on youtube here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdHiBlXYLJU) his colleagues and officer Wetzel were taken aback by his stunt and that has to speak to something. though, i think it was on par for his anything-for-ratings style.

]]> By: Radio Matthew http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30047 Radio Matthew Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:48:10 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30047 I thought the "new low" was the Sactown Raw fighting girls thing? So this, you're saying, is even lower than that? Come on guys, get over it. I thought the “new low” was the Sactown Raw fighting girls thing? So this, you’re saying, is even lower than that? Come on guys, get over it.

]]> By: basuraman http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30013 basuraman Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:50:39 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30013 I am thinking some vitamin water and a cliff bar..although maybe Chris just gave him what he had sitting in his car? I am thinking some vitamin water and a cliff bar..although maybe Chris just gave him what he had sitting in his car?

]]> By: TD http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30006 TD Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:03:51 +0000 http://sacrag.com/2007/11/omg-a-new-low-for-cbs13/#comment-30006 Yeah, that's probably in poor taste... the McDonalds I mean. And while they ought to expect to field many bad reactions from viewers, I kinda get this "don't feed the bears" type of vibe. I mean, they're homeless people, not animals. I'm sure the McDonalds and beer was greatly appreciated. I doubt the person got sh*tfaced and obese from the incident. Now if he gave the homeless person some apple juice and a garden salad... well that would just be condescending. Yeah, that’s probably in poor taste… the McDonalds I mean.

And while they ought to expect to field many bad reactions from viewers, I kinda get this “don’t feed the bears” type of vibe. I mean, they’re homeless people, not animals. I’m sure the McDonalds and beer was greatly appreciated. I doubt the person got sh*tfaced and obese from the incident. Now if he gave the homeless person some apple juice and a garden salad… well that would just be condescending.

]]>