the Sac Rag

Sacramento News, Gossip & Snark

If you live here, you'll know...

Arena boosters distance themselves from Maloofs, voters

Posted September 13, 2006 at 8:16 AM by CoolDMZ in Downtown (3 comments)

I don’t blame the Arena supportes for distancing themselves from Joe Maloof’s apparently off-the-cuff prepared statement last week about the possibility of the railyard site not materializing. But in doing so they bury a key point of the agreement they made with the Maloofs: namely that the railyard site might not materialize and that “we may have to consider alternative locations in Sacramento.” They know it’s true because they signed the document, things Dignan’s not supposed to touch. Oops, sorry.

Campaign chairperson Sandy Smoley told News10 in a written statement. “The community has decided that the best place for its new arena is at the old Sacramento railyards, and we have no doubt that this is where it will be.

The community decided that? When was that, was I out of the country when we decided that?

If they indeed have no doubt, then why bother writing the following language into the August 2nd Preliminary Term Sheet: “If satisfactory arrangements cannot be made with the developer of the rail yards site, the Parties will consider alternative sites for the SEF, including land owned by the City or the Kings or their affiliates in North Natomas.”

MSE President John Thomas argues that “Joe [Maloof] wants to make sure the voters are fully informed… There could be circumstances out of everyone’s control that keep us from being able to (build an arena) where we all think it’s best done, at the railyards.” Sounds like something Sandy Smoley and the rest of the campaign would want to distance themselves from.

I guess skepticism is needed, and the truth behind this probably is that the Maloofs are working themselves into better bargaining position. Better than all profits, 11% of costs, no possessory interest tax, no special taxes, final say on the site, and all the firstborn sons of Citrus Heights (you didn’t read the document, did you!). But the only reason the campaign would want to ignore the possibility of Natomas Arena III is that they probably think we wouldn’t vote for that–after all, we already decided on the railyards site!



3 Comments | Leave a comment


Scooter said

As much as I wish I could match your mal-content towards ArenaGate 2006 (my mal-content is a little tired today, but please go on with your bad self), I can match your appreciation for obscure Wes Anderson film quotes.

Do I get a no-prize?

posted 9/13/06 at 12:56 pm #

cooldmz said

Scooter, you’re the big winner! your prize is another quote: So you told your friend I’m some sort of jet pilot?

posted 9/13/06 at 2:13 pm #

norm said

Campaign chairman Sandy Smoley offered an interesting statement:

“The community has decided that the best place for its new arena is at the old Sacramento railyards, and we have no doubt that this is where it will be.”

After running it through the bullcrap dectector, her carefully written statement is really suggesting that they have no doubt that the “best place” for the arena will be at the railyards. Even if it gets built in Natomas, they’ll still have no doubt that the best place for a new arena will be downtown.

posted 9/13/06 at 4:48 pm #


Leave a comment

Anonymous




HTML: You can use these tags in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Copyright © 2008 The Sac Rag. All rights hella reserved. Powered by WordPress. Hosted by Cornerhost.