I know the overvaluation of our local housing market is not news to most people who care about that sort of thing, and I don’t generally like to obsess about this stuff, because I realize that although I am technically sitting on a big pile of potential cash or potential financial ruin, it is also still the place where my shirts and underwear and bathroom are for the time being. But this caught my eye. #11 with a bullet! Whoo hoo!!
But seriously. There are no cities in California outside the top 53. Hey, can we blame people though? But look closer: I am no urban/ecomonical expert, but how is San Francisco the least overvalued metro area in CA? From what I can tell {PDF file}, the most recent median price for Sacto is $377.4, and the most recent median for SF is $726.9. In other words, the other factors about SF would have to account for that difference and also for Sacto being almost twice as overvalued. What am I missing?
But again, I don’t really care. I’m just median-bashing. I’ll leave the rest of the discussion and the obvious factual errors I’m overlooking to the comments box.