So the City Attorney, Eileen Teichert (any relation?) does not believe the public needs to see the details of proposed arena agreements because, according to legal briefs, the proposed draft agreement was “‘essentially the same document'” as a term sheet previously signed by the the Kings owners — the Maloof family — the city and the county and released to the public.” (from the Bee). I assume they are referring to the August 2 Preliminary Term Sheet (PDF) which contains the following provision:
If the County Board of Supervisors approves the Ballot Proposals, this Term Sheet shall nevertheless terminate and be of no force or effect if on or before October 6, 2006: … a definitive Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is not executed and delivered by the parties.
Presumably, at the time the officials thought one month was the least amount of time we voters would need to make up our minds. This Term Sheet is signed by the City, the County, and MSE and it is completely invalid. If the City attorney expects us to refer to a public document, perhaps she should pick one that has some sort of legally enforceable status? Continue reading “Arena Term Sheet is invalid”
Earlier this year I found myself in Cincinnati, and now that I’ve seen that town I have some tough questions for Sacramento about the “city of trees” mantra that we like to repeat about our fair city to anyone who’ll listen. I was lucky enough to get a 19th story view of southeastern Cincy from a Hyde Park highrise and I have to tell you, Cincinnati looks more like a forest with a giant city hidden in its midst. It should be in the dictionary next to the word “nestled.” It kind of looks like
Not that I, you know, go out and do stuff or anything, but I noted that The Crest added a second show of humorist